Usage
s_proportion(
df,
.var,
conf_level = 0.95,
method = c("waldcc", "wald", "clopper-pearson", "wilson", "wilsonc", "strat_wilson",
"strat_wilsonc", "agresti-coull", "jeffreys"),
weights = NULL,
max_iterations = 50,
variables = list(strata = NULL),
long = FALSE
)
a_proportion(
df,
.var,
conf_level = 0.95,
method = c("waldcc", "wald", "clopper-pearson", "wilson", "wilsonc", "strat_wilson",
"strat_wilsonc", "agresti-coull", "jeffreys"),
weights = NULL,
max_iterations = 50,
variables = list(strata = NULL),
long = FALSE
)
estimate_proportion(
lyt,
vars,
...,
show_labels = "hidden",
table_names = vars,
.stats = NULL,
.formats = NULL,
.labels = NULL,
.indent_mods = NULL
)
Arguments
- df
(
logical
ordata.frame
)
if only a logical vector is used, it indicates whether each subject is a responder or not.TRUE
represents a successful outcome. If adata.frame
is provided, also thestrata
variable names must be provided invariables
as a list element with the strata strings. In the case ofdata.frame
, the logical vector of responses must be indicated as a variable name in.var
.- .var
(
string
)
single variable name that is passed byrtables
when requested by a statistics function.- conf_level
(
proportion
)
confidence level of the interval.- method
(
string
)
the method used to construct the confidence interval for proportion of successful outcomes; one ofwaldcc
,wald
,clopper-pearson
,wilson
,wilsonc
,strat_wilson
,strat_wilsonc
,agresti-coull
orjeffreys
.- weights
(
numeric
orNULL
)
weights for each level of the strata. IfNULL
, they are estimated using the iterative algorithm proposed in Yan and Su (2010) that minimizes the weighted squared length of the confidence interval.- max_iterations
(
count
)
maximum number of iterations for the iterative procedure used to find estimates of optimal weights.- variables
(named
list
ofstring
)
list of additional analysis variables.- long
(
flag
)
a long description is required.- lyt
(
layout
)
input layout where analyses will be added to.- vars
(
character
)
variable names for the primary analysis variable to be iterated over.- ...
other arguments are ultimately conveyed to
s_proportion()
.- show_labels
label visibility: one of "default", "visible" and "hidden".
- table_names
(
character
)
this can be customized in case that the samevars
are analyzed multiple times, to avoid warnings fromrtables
.- .stats
(
character
)
statistics to select for the table.- .formats
(named
character
orlist
)
formats for the statistics.- .labels
(named
character
)
labels for the statistics (without indent).- .indent_mods
(named
integer
)
indent modifiers for the labels.
Functions
s_proportion()
: statistics function estimating a proportion along with its confidence interval.a_proportion()
: Formatted Analysis function which can be further customized by callingrtables::make_afun()
on it. It is used asafun
inrtables::analyze()
.estimate_proportion()
: used in artables
pipeline.
Examples
# Case with only logical vector.
rsp_v <- c(1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0)
s_proportion(rsp_v)
#> $n_prop
#> [1] 4.0 0.5
#> attr(,"label")
#> [1] "Responders"
#>
#> $prop_ci
#> [1] 9.102404 90.897596
#> attr(,"label")
#> [1] "95% CI (Wald, with correction)"
#>
# Example for Stratified Wilson CI
nex <- 100 # Number of example rows
dta <- data.frame(
"rsp" = sample(c(TRUE, FALSE), nex, TRUE),
"grp" = sample(c("A", "B"), nex, TRUE),
"f1" = sample(c("a1", "a2"), nex, TRUE),
"f2" = sample(c("x", "y", "z"), nex, TRUE),
stringsAsFactors = TRUE
)
s_proportion(
df = dta,
.var = "rsp",
variables = list(strata = c("f1", "f2")),
conf_level = 0.90,
method = "strat_wilson"
)
#> $n_prop
#> [1] 49.00 0.49
#> attr(,"label")
#> [1] "Responders"
#>
#> $prop_ci
#> lower upper
#> 40.80675 56.65017
#> attr(,"label")
#> [1] "90% CI (Stratified Wilson, without correction)"
#>
dta_test <- data.frame(
USUBJID = paste0("S", 1:12),
ARM = rep(LETTERS[1:3], each = 4),
AVAL = c(A = c(1, 1, 1, 1), B = c(0, 0, 1, 1), C = c(0, 0, 0, 0))
)
basic_table() %>%
split_cols_by("ARM") %>%
estimate_proportion(vars = "AVAL") %>%
build_table(df = dta_test)
#> A B C
#> ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
#> Responders 4 (100.0%) 2 (50.0%) 0 (0.0%)
#> 95% CI (Wald, with correction) (87.5, 100.0) (0.0, 100.0) (0.0, 12.5)